Sourcebook for Political Communication Research: Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques: Routledge Communication
Autor Erik P. Bucy, R. Lance Holbert, E. Page Bucyen Limba Engleză Paperback – 27 mar 2013
The need for this Sourcebook stems from recent innovations in political communication involving the use of advanced statistical techniques, innovative conceptual frameworks, the rise of digital media as both a means by which to disseminate and study political communication, and methods recently adapted from other disciplines, particularly psychology, sociology, and neuroscience. Chapters will have a social-scientific orientation and will explain new methodologies and measures applicable to questions regarding media, politics, and civic life. The Sourcebook covers the major analytical techniques used in political communication research, including surveys (both original data collections and secondary analyses), experiments, content analysis, discourse analysis (focus groups and textual analysis), network and deliberation analysis, comparative study designs, statistical analysis, and measurement issues.
Din seria Routledge Communication
- 8% Preț: 466.68 lei
- 8% Preț: 375.63 lei
- 8% Preț: 395.36 lei
- Preț: 156.30 lei
- Preț: 301.31 lei
- Preț: 379.51 lei
- 9% Preț: 903.78 lei
- 9% Preț: 837.60 lei
- Preț: 375.31 lei
- Preț: 373.09 lei
- 9% Preț: 1349.57 lei
- 8% Preț: 516.67 lei
- 8% Preț: 458.71 lei
- Preț: 344.67 lei
- Preț: 323.17 lei
- Preț: 267.83 lei
- 9% Preț: 837.68 lei
- Preț: 121.57 lei
- Preț: 337.03 lei
- Preț: 377.36 lei
- Preț: 371.31 lei
- 9% Preț: 1284.44 lei
- 9% Preț: 1285.10 lei
- 8% Preț: 494.99 lei
- Preț: 323.12 lei
- 18% Preț: 848.06 lei
- Preț: 337.43 lei
- 18% Preț: 848.55 lei
- 55% Preț: 414.02 lei
- Preț: 179.57 lei
- 8% Preț: 349.87 lei
- Preț: 271.22 lei
Preț: 496.83 lei
Preț vechi: 540.04 lei
-8%
Puncte Express: 745
Preț estimativ în valută:
95.19€ • 103.11$ • 81.63£
95.19€ • 103.11$ • 81.63£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 09-23 mai
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780415884976
ISBN-10: 0415884977
Pagini: 608
Ilustrații: 21 tables and Following “Evidence-Based Intervention Design” (9780415964555)
Dimensiuni: 175 x 244 x 38 mm
Greutate: 1.02 kg
Editura: Routledge
Seria Routledge Communication
ISBN-10: 0415884977
Pagini: 608
Ilustrații: 21 tables and Following “Evidence-Based Intervention Design” (9780415964555)
Dimensiuni: 175 x 244 x 38 mm
Greutate: 1.02 kg
Editura: Routledge
Seria Routledge Communication
Cuprins
Advancing Methods and Measurement: Supporting Theory and Keeping Pace with the Modern Political Environment
Gerald Kosicki, The Ohio State University
Doug M. McLeod, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Jack M. McLeod, University of Wisconsin-Madison
R. Lance Holbert, The Ohio State University
Erik P. Bucy, Indiana University
Part 1: Survey Methodology
Challenges and Opportunities of Panel DesignsErik P. Bucy, Indiana University
Part 1: Survey Methodology
William P. Eveland, Jr., The Ohio State University
Alyssa C. Morey, The Ohio State University
The Rolling Cross-Section: Design and Utility for Political ResearchAlyssa C. Morey, The Ohio State University
Kate Kenski, University of Arizona
Jeffrey A. Gottfried, University of Pennsylvania
Kathleen Hall Jamieson, University of Pennsylvania
Political Communication Survey Research: Challenges, Trends, OpportunitiesJeffrey A. Gottfried, University of Pennsylvania
Kathleen Hall Jamieson, University of Pennsylvania
Lindsay H. Hoffman, University of Delaware
Dannagal Goldthwaite Young, University of Delaware
Part II: Secondary Analysis and Meta Analysis
Secondary Analysis In Political Communication Viewed as Creative ActDannagal Goldthwaite Young, University of Delaware
Part II: Secondary Analysis and Meta Analysis
R. Lance Holbert, The Ohio State University
Jay Hmielowski, The Ohio State University
Comparing the ANES and NAES for Political Communication ResearchJay Hmielowski, The Ohio State University
Michael W. Wagner, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
The Implications and Consequences of Using Meta-Analysis for Political CommunicationMike Allen, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
David D’Alessio, University of Connecticut
Nancy Burrell, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Part III: Experimental Methods
Experimental Designs for Political Communication Research: Using New Technology and Online Participant Pools to Overcome the Problem of GeneralizabilityDavid D’Alessio, University of Connecticut
Nancy Burrell, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Part III: Experimental Methods
Shanto Iyengar, Stanford University
Expressing versus Revealing Preferences in Experimental ResearchYanna Krupnikov, Indiana University
Adam Seth Levine, University of Michigan
The Face as a Focus of Political Communication: Evolutionary Perspectives, Experimental Methods, and the Ethological ApproachAdam Seth Levine, University of Michigan
Patrick A. Stewart, University of Arkansas
Frank K. Salter, Max Planck Society, Andechs, Germany
Marc Mehu, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
Multi-Stage Experimental Designs in Political Communication ResearchFrank K. Salter, Max Planck Society, Andechs, Germany
Marc Mehu, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
Glenn J. Hansen, University of Oklahoma
Michael Pfau, University of Oklahoma
Part IV: Content Analysis
Image Bite Analysis of Political VisualsMichael Pfau, University of Oklahoma
Part IV: Content Analysis
Maria Elizabeth Grabe, Indiana University
Erik P. Bucy, Indiana University
Identifying Frames in Political NewsErik P. Bucy, Indiana University
Dennis Chong, Northwestern University
James N. Druckman, Northwestern University
Content Analysis in Political CommunicationJames N. Druckman, Northwestern University
William L. Benoit, Ohio University
Part V: Discourse Analysis
The Uses of Focus Groups in Political Communication ResearchPart V: Discourse Analysis
Sharon E. Jarvis, University of Texas-Austin
Genealogy of Myth in Presidential RhetoricRobert L. Ivie, Indiana University
Oscar Giner, Arizona State University
Part VI: Network and Deliberation Analysis
Methods for Analyzing and Measuring Group DeliberationOscar Giner, Arizona State University
Part VI: Network and Deliberation Analysis
Laura W. Black, Ohio University
Stephanie Burkhalter, Humboldt State University
John Gastil, University of Washington
Jennifer Stromer-Galley, University of Albany, SUNY
Porous Networks and Overlapping Contexts: Methodological Challenges in the Study of Social Communication and Political BehaviorStephanie Burkhalter, Humboldt State University
John Gastil, University of Washington
Jennifer Stromer-Galley, University of Albany, SUNY
Scott D. McClurg, Southern Illinois University
Comparative Political Communication
Mediatization of Politics: Toward a Conceptual Framework for Comparative ResearchComparative Political Communication
Jesper Stromback, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden
International Applications of the Agenda-Setting Acapulco TypologyMaxwell E. McCombs, University of Texas-Austin
Salma Ghanem, University of Texas-Pan American
Federico Rey Lennon, Catholic University, Argentina
R. Warwick Blood, University of Canberra, Australia
Katherine Chen, National Chengchi University, Taiwan
Political Communication Across the World: Methodological Issues Involved in International ComparisonsSalma Ghanem, University of Texas-Pan American
Federico Rey Lennon, Catholic University, Argentina
R. Warwick Blood, University of Canberra, Australia
Katherine Chen, National Chengchi University, Taiwan
Christina Holtz-Bacha, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
Lynda Lee Kaid, University of Florida
Part VII: Statistical Techniques
Expanding the Use of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) in Political CommunicationLynda Lee Kaid, University of Florida
Part VII: Statistical Techniques
R. Lance Holbert, The Ohio State University
Heather L. LaMarre, University of Minnesota
Mediation and the Estimation of Indirect Effects in Political Communication ResearchHeather L. LaMarre, University of Minnesota
Andrew F. Hayes, The Ohio State University
Kristopher J. Preacher, University of Kansas
Teresa A. Myers, The Ohio State University
Time-Series Analysis and the Study of Political CommunicationKristopher J. Preacher, University of Kansas
Teresa A. Myers, The Ohio State University
Jennifer Jerit, Florida State University
Adam F. Simon, Yale University
Part VIII: Measurement
Concept Explication in the Internet Age: The Case of InteractivityAdam F. Simon, Yale University
Part VIII: Measurement
S. Shyam Sundar, The Pennsylvania State University
Saraswathi Bellur, The Pennsylvania State University
Beyond Self-Report: Using Latency Measures to Model the Question Answering Process on Web-Based Public Opinion SurveysSaraswathi Bellur, The Pennsylvania State University
John E. Newhagen, University of Maryland
What the Body Can Tell Us About Politics: The Use of Psychophysiological Measures in Political Communication ResearchErik P. Bucy, Indiana University
Samuel D. Bradley, Texas Tech University
Part IX: Conclusion
Looking Back and Looking Forward: Observations on a Rapidly Evolving FieldSamuel D. Bradley, Texas Tech University
Part IX: Conclusion
Gerald Kosicki, The Ohio State University
Doug M. McLeod, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Jack M. McLeod, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Notă biografică
Erik P. Bucy (PhD, University of Maryland, College Park, 1998) is an Associate Professor of Telecommunications and Adjunct Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science and School of Informatics at Indiana University, Bloomington. Bucy is the editor of Politics and the Life Sciences, and author, with Maria Grabe, of Image Bite Politics: News and the Visual Framing of Elections (Oxford, 2009). Bucy serves on the editorial boards of Human Communication Research, The Information Society, and Mass Communication and Society. He has held visiting and research appointments at the University of Michigan and Dartmouth College.
R. Lance Holbert (PhD, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2000) is an Associate Professor in the School of Communication at The Ohio State University. He is the author of several articles on the use of structural equation modeling in the communication sciences. His most recent research has appeared in Journal of Communication, Communication Research, Communication Monographs, and Media Psychology. He serves on many editorial boards, including Journal of Communication, Communication Monographs, and the Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media.
R. Lance Holbert (PhD, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2000) is an Associate Professor in the School of Communication at The Ohio State University. He is the author of several articles on the use of structural equation modeling in the communication sciences. His most recent research has appeared in Journal of Communication, Communication Research, Communication Monographs, and Media Psychology. He serves on many editorial boards, including Journal of Communication, Communication Monographs, and the Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media.